HIV - The Next Big One?
Nevada has multiple new laws related to HIV testing and treatment. What's going on here?
Remember the documentary “Pandemic - How to Prevent An Outbreak” that aired on Netflix in January 2020? At the time this film was linked to Bill Gates but I am having trouble remembering the exact details of how he was involved in this project. It was no secret though that this film was his baby. That one gave us a glimpse into the future. Little did we know at the time that less than 2 months later a global “pandemic” was going to be unleashed on us resulting in the loss of life as we knew it with government tyranny and loss of personal liberties taking place in virtually every single corner of the planet. Some of the footage in this film was shot in Oregon during the SB3063 fight against mandatory vaccines for all schoolchildren, in which I was heavily involved and working with Oregonians For Medical Freedom. At the time, the Netflix producers were running around during a couple of our rallies trying to interview freedom fighters. We were wary and rightfully so, but a few of the moms did agree to interviews. The finished product did not paint us medical freedom advocates in a good light. Imagine that.
Just a couple of weeks ago I came across this recent documentary “A Social Cure” on Amazon Prime: Watch it! It’s about HIV testing, pre-exposure treatment and post-exposure treatment and the social manipulation that is being inflicted upon ordinary citizens in South Africa. The folks that are interviewed in this film discussing the ways to coerce unsuspecting victims is unreal! And the reason I think it’s so important that you watch this is because I personally think this may very well be coming to a neighborhood near you. This film pretty much lays out the pharma plan which involves testing everybody every 3 months and dispensing pharmaceutical drugs both pre-exposure for everybody and post-exposure for those that do test positive. Lest you forget….HIV has never been proven to be the cause of AIDS. It’s a theory. And one that is opposed by many in the scientific and medical communities. For a refresher on that please be sure to read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s best selling book, The Real Anthony Fauci; Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health
Now on to Nevada. Let me remind readers of the difference between NRS (Nevada Revised Statute) and NAC (Nevada Administrative Code). NRS are laws that are passed by the elected legislature. Legislative bills always apply to NRS laws (statutes). These are typically more general in nature with less specific verbiage. The NAC codes follow and those codes are the details of the NRS laws. NACs are drafted by UN-ELECTED bureaucrats within the related state agency or governing board. After the proposed NACs have been drafted, the agency or board must hold a public workshop where, theoretically, members of the public are invited to participate in the fine tuning of the proposed NACs. After the public workshop is held, there is a public hearing where again members of the public may comment on details and/or provide their support or opposition of the proposed NAC code. After the public hearing, the governing agency or board holds a vote and if approved by a majority these NAC updates must go to the legislature for final approval also by majority vote. In the case of these “public health” related NRS laws, the Department of Public and Behavioral Health (DPBH) and their Board of Health or their Board of Pharmacy have jurisdiction, so the following NAC law updates come through this agency. To summarize, the process of an NAC becoming codified law is:
Public Workshop
Public Hearing
Committee or Board Majority Vote
Legislative Approval
Here in Nevada there were several new NRS laws related to HIV that were passed in the 2021 legislative session. Literally in the middle of the chaos of the covid pandemic, Nevada legislators almost unanimously passed multiple bills that have the potential to further erode and/or destroy medical choice in our state. They were written with HIV specifically mentioned; although they’ve been left open-ended enough for one to reasonably assume that any communicable disease can be inserted and applied at a later time. I previously wrote THIS ARTICLE about the first of these bills that I came across some months ago:
SB211 HIV Modernization Bill and LCB R002-22 NAC: The bill updates HIV protocols and essentially binds the state to federal government (vis a vis the CDC) oversight on all things HIV and “communicable disease” related. This new law, which was passed and signed into law in 2021 and the proposed NAC update which is currently going through the process of becoming codified, substantially increases HIV testing and treatment for all Nevadans. The Board of Health has scheduled a public hearing on these proposed NAC updates and they will likely also be voting on them on 6/3/22. Then they’ll go to the Legislative Commission for a vote and either be approved and implemented or they will fail the vote and the Board of Health will have to start over with a new version of these. Modernization appears to mean mass testing and mass pre-exposure and post-exposure pharmaceutical drug treatment. You can read my earlier article summarizing the details of that bill HERE.
Here are the other HIV bills and NAC updates that cropped up in 2021 & 2022 and that could all plausibly be tied to a larger plan put forth by the pharmaceutical industry and their cronies in government.
SB275 NRS Health Authority Quarantine Bill: This bill gives broad power to “public health authorities” and allows the state to “isolate, quarantine or treat” citizens at the sole discretion of the health authorities. Read those words again. This bill allows the public health officials to order ISOLATION, QUARANTINE & TREATMENT of citizens. This bill makes no mention of informed consent. The language in this bill is incredibly concerning and if you thought the past 2 years of Covid-19 showed substantial government overreach….this has the potential for next level tyranny. When this law is in place and the next “pandemic” hits, we will not have the freedom to opt out of whatever pharma may have in store for all of us. This bill passed the legislature and was signed into law, but the supporting NAC updates have yet to be published. I’ll do a thorough analysis of the bill and the proposed NAC update once those are made public. I highly suggest you read the details of this new law (linked above). If this doesn’t scare you, I don’t know what will.
Newborn Blood Screening LCB File R088-20 NAC: The Nevada Board of Health drafted an NAC update which substantially changes existing law relating to the requirement of this blood screening test for Nevada infants. The new law expands this requirement to include every single infant born in the state rather than just those born in hospitals (as is current code). The blood sample tests for “preventable or inherited disorders” with each sample being housed in the Nevada State Newborn Screening Lab at the University of Nevada Reno (UNR). With these proposed NAC changes, the mother of every infant born in Nevada will be required to obtain and submit a blood sample from her baby in the absence of a birth “professional”. For infants born at home, this means the mother would be responsible, by law, to have her baby tested. The new code does not provide the mother or the parents a clear way to “opt out”. These blood samples are kept in the State Newborn Screening Lab at UNR and there is nothing written into the code that would prevent the lab or the state from selling or sharing this personal DNA data with third parties as happened in California where data was sold to private corporations. Will we take them at their word when they tell us that they won’t sell this data? Why is this expansion of the blood test/screening necessary and why now? Will newborns be tested for HIV? Could this be related to the other new HIV testing and pharmaceutical treatment laws? This NAC update has been approved by the Board of Health and now just requires approval by the Legislative Commission when they next meet. Let’s hope these updates fail in that committee.
SB325 Pharmacist HIV Test & Treat Bill and NAC LCB File No. R039-21: This new NRS law and NAC code essentially removes the physician from the HIV testing and treatment equation and will allow pharmacists to directly prescribe HIV (and plausibly any number of other tbd ”communicable diseases”) drugs to pharmacy customers. This bypasses OTC (Over The Counter) drug approval processes and regulations and essentially creates a new 3rd and direct path for pharmaceuticals to get to the consumer. It also bypasses physicians and other prescribing professionals such as Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants. Incidentally, the CDC Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 update document lists many pre-exposure prophylactic and post-exposure treatment drugs that will certainly be included in those that will be dispensed directly to consumers under this new law. By the way, in the olden days (yesterday), pre-exposure prophylaxis was called vaccination. This NAC update has passed the Board of Pharmacy vote and will next go before the Legislative Commission when they meet next. Maybe they’ll stand up for Nevadans and send this code update back to the drawing board.
I don’t know if other states have passed similar legislation recently. I would guess that the very industry that stands to gain financially from the sale of drugs as the result of all of these new HIV related laws and codes is directly responsible for all of these new laws and codes. Only time and FOIA requests will tell.
And in other news, imagine my surprise in hearing the Big Guy in the Oval Office unveil a new plan termed “test to treat” during his State of The Union address a couple of days ago. Buckle up - this could get bumpy. Especially as the doctor members of the American Medical Association have now realized that this plan cuts them out of the potential cash cow all of this testing and pharma treatment has the potential to provide them. There seems to be quite an uproar coming from them this week. We’ll see how that all plays out.
I’ve added the option of paid subscriptions to this newsletter, so if you are able to become a paid subscriber please help support our work in Nevada. All of the money goes to the non-profit Health Freedom Nevada and our work there to protect informed consent, religious freedom and parental choice for all citizens of our state. Thank you for reading this newsletter and for your continued support!
It’s very telling how they used the “HIV” virus causes the disease AIDS just like they did with the “SARS-Cov-2” virus causes the disease Covid-19. In both cases, the presence of a virus has never proven to be isolated and both used a PCR test which was not designed to even test for a virus. Because of fear and propaganda, people who were asymptomatic were conditioned to test for something that they showed no symptoms for, just like with Covid. The AZT drug caused massive deaths and injury with HIV/AIDS and here we are with the “vaccine” for SARS-cov-2/Covid-19 doing the same. So many connections from that situation to what we are now experiencing.
This is horrifying!